NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages

Lower TDP (171W vs 285W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages

Released 15 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock2610MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

8232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

0.536 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +8127%

44.1 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

VS

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Jan 2024

GeForce 200

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2340 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2610 MHz

999 MHz

Memory Clock

1313 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6X

448bit

Memory Bus

256bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

672.3GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

66

-

Compute Units

-

216

Shading Units

8448

72

TMUs

264

28

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

264

-

RT Cores

66

-

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

224 KB

L2 Cache

48 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

250.6 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

689.0 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

44.10 TFLOPS

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

44.10 TFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

689.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

AD103

G200-103-B2

GPU Variant

AD103-275-A1

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

5 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

45.9 billion

470 mm²

Die Size

379 mm²

Board Design

171W

TDP

285W

450 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

CUDA

8.9

4.0

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip