Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +7%
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
216
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
20
28
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Oland
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy