Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170 +19%
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV670
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy