Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2004
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
12
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
NV41
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy