Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 +496%
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
M93
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy