Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro S7000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro S7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000 +409%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy