Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630 +283%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
TU117
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy