Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +1574%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Capsaicin
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy