Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270 +151%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
192
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
RV770
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy