Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition +48%
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
512bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GT200B
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy