Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB +771%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GK110B
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy