Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 9100 +2476%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Vega 10
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy