Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 +4524%
22.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
34
192
Shading Units
4352
64
TMUs
136
28
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
AD104
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
AD104-150-K1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy