Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
10560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe +7744%
37.42 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
84
192
Shading Units
10752
64
TMUs
336
28
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GA102
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy