Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 4750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4750 +95%
0.934 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.68 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
934.4 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
186.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
RV740
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
RV740 PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy