Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700 +1716%
8.663 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
205W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 10
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy