Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +3635%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
28
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 21
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy