Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +4516%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
28
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 21
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy