Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +6598%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 32
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy