Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +161%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Lexa
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy