Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM +68%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Oland
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy