Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +2547%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
70
192
Shading Units
4480
64
TMUs
280
28
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GA100
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy