Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +1617%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Fiji
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy