Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2415%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
22
192
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
28
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
AD107
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy