Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
12608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +13585%
65.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
100
192
Shading Units
12800
64
TMUs
400
28
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
AD102
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy