Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
17984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +18990%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
142
192
Shading Units
18176
64
TMUs
568
28
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
AD102
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy