Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M +144%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2013
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK107
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy