Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 5950

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 5950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 1024MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 302W)
ATI Radeon HD 5950 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 5950 +235%
2.088 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1440
80
TMUs
72
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.088 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

219W
TDP
302W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Hemlock
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
Hemlock PRO
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy