Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro S9050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050 +418%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy