Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +714%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
512bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Hawaii
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy