Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI FirePro V8750

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI FirePro V8750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (151W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro V8750 +92%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
800
80
TMUs
40
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
151W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
RV770
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy