Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI FirePro V9800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +337%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1600
80
TMUs
80
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Cypress
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy