CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
+379%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
VS
GeForce GTX 1650
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
219W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
TU117
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 590
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
Related News
1
Introducing the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX: A First Look at the Flagship Gaming Laptop CPU
2
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
3
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
4
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
5
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
6
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
7
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
8
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
9
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
10
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy