CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1792GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (182W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
+49%
0.622 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
VS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Dec 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
448bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
24
240
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
219W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
GT200B
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy