Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +989%
6.774 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1042 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
96bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
18
240
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
72
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
GA107
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy