Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
19216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +12024%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
448bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
1216
28
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
750W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
153 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy