Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 +36%
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
400
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

204W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Redwood
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy