Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8100 +1418%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Vega 10
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy