Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +167%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy