Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD FirePro D500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD FirePro D500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (274W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
FirePro D500 +273%
2.227 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
24
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
96
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
274W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy