Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +1631%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
56
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy