Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
36.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Oland
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy