Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 9070 XT +3611%
22.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi IV(RX 9000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2210 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
259.2 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
691.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.24 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.12 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 48
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy