Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 289W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
41W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV530
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy