CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 's Advantages
More VRAM (768GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.60GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
+50%
0.749 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2950 XTX
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
VS
Radeon HD 2950 XTX
Graphics Card
Nov 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
81.60GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
288
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
31.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
748.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
62.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
RV670
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV670 XTX (215-0708004)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
110W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970 X2
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs AMD FirePro RG220A
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7790
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy