Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs ATI FirePro V3750

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 X2 +167%
0.942 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.814 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
39.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
941.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
78.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
48W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
RV730
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy