Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs AMD FirePro W4300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +51%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Dec 2015
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.814 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
39.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
941.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
78.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Bonaire
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy