Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +1194%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.814 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
39.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
941.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
78.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Navi 33
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 33
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy