Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +215%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
375W
750 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Tahiti
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy