Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 SE and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 SE
0.848 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +235%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 500
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
957 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
91.87GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
14
288
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.832 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
35.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
847.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
70.66 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
TU116
GF114-200-KB-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy